![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapel Hill, NC |
|||
Two bioretention cells were constructed at the University Mall in Chapel Hill, NC. The larger of the two cells was monitored. It had a drainage area of 0.15 ac. Results of this study site are available in Hunt et al. (2006) [Journal of Irrigation & Drainage Engineering] and Hunt (2003) [Ph.D. dissertation]. Monitoring Period: June 2002 - April 2003 Media Depth: 4 ft Media Characteristics: low P-Index (4-12), saturated hydraulic conductivity 1.3-3.1 in/hr Drainage Configuration: conventional In-situ soil: relatively tight clay Vegetative Cover: mulch/tree/shrub/perennials |
|||