
The objectives of the RCWP (45 Federal Register 14006, March 4, 1980) were to:
Land use is primarily agricultural, characterized by intensive dairy and beef cattle farming. The critical area (63,109 acres) included dairy farms, drained and fertilized pastures, and areas close to a waterway. The project water quality goal was a 50% reduction in phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations in water flowing into Lake Okeechobee. BMPs installed included stream protection systems, reduction of barn waste, animal waste management, diversions, grazing land protection, permanent vegetative cover, sediment retention structures, and water control structures.
An intensive water quality monitoring program was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs in reducing phosphorus loads to the lake. The monitoring program was designed to facilitate comparison of water quality data collected before, during, and after BMP implementation. Accounting for changes in animal density, ground water table depth, and upstream phosphorus concentrations during the project period facilitated documentation of the effects on water quality of BMPs installed. Land treatment tracking (recording BMP implementation and location in relation to water bodies) aided in the determination that changes in water quality resulted from BMP implementation. The project exceeded its phosphorus reduction goals, despite substantial increases in animal density.
High nutrient concentrations in runoff from agricultural land in the watershed were causing advanced eutrophication in several lakes and ponds used for primary and secondary contact recreation, such as swimming, boating, and fishing. Also affected were maintenance and propagation of fish and aquatic life, industrial and agricultural water supply, drainage, navigation (in the tidal portion of the river), and passage of anadromous fish. Problems included bacterial contamination, fish kills, and algal growth.
The objective of the RCWP project was to reduce cropland erosion and nutrient transport, decrease nutrient applications, and properly manage animal waste. The BMPs emphasized were no-till, pesticide and fertilizer management, cover crops, grassed waterways, and filter strips.
Producer participation was high and BMPs were applied to over 85% of the 13,000-acre critical area. No-till acreage increased from 50% of the cropland to 90%. Improved fertilizer management cut the pre-project phosphorus application rate in half. In one pond, sediment and phosphorus declined by 90% and 65%, respectively. Suspended solids in the river decreased by 60%.
The project combined excellent inter-agency cooperation and an effective information and education program. Benefits spread beyond the project area. By the end of the 10-year project, most farmers in the county had voluntarily adopted no-till techniques, although its use in corn production has since decreased as a result of slug damage.
Poor water quality impairs recreation, salmon spawning, and fishing. Rock Creek delivers a disproportionate load of sediment to Snake River. NPS pollutants are sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen from irrigation return flows, streambank erosion, and animal waste.
The project objective was to reduce sediment, phosphorus, and nitrogen discharging into Rock Creek. All irrigated cropland and animal operations were considered part of the critical area (28,159 acres). Land treatment to prevent sediment from entering irrigation drains by controlling erosion and trapping sediment was implemented on 75% of the critical area. BMPs included sediment retention structures, irrigation water management, vegetative filter strips, cover crops, conservation tillage, and animal waste management.
The objectives of the water quality monitoring program were to document: 1) changes in sediment and nutrient concentrations and 2) beneficial use improvements. Water quality was monitored both upstream and downstream of significant NPS pollutant sources before, during, and after BMP implementation. Effectiveness of individual BMPs was measured in this RCWP project.
Improvements in the ability of the stream to support designated uses were documented through monitoring of in-stream habitats, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish populations. Innovative techniques to measure trout spawning habitat by directly measuring substrate oxygen were developed in the course of the project.
Management practices, such as conservation tillage and water management, were found to be the most cost-effective BMPs for reducing sediment loss on a per-acre basis. BMPs implemented through the RCWP project decreased sediment and phosphorus delivery to the river by 75% and 68%, respectively. In addition, fish populations in Rock Creek below agricultural areas appeared to improve during the course of the project.
The RCWP project was aimed at reducing agricultural NPS pollution by implementing BMPs on 15,000 critical acres. Through the project, 74% of the critical area and 76% of the manure were treated with cropland protection and animal waste management system BMPs.
The extent and location of BMP implementation and land use were tracked using a geographic information system. Pertinent farm data, such as the quantity and timing of manure application and the number of cows under BMP manure management, were also recorded. These data were used to correlate land treatment to water quality on a subwatershed scale. The strongest correlation was between an increasing proportion of animals under BMP manure management and decreasing bacterial contamination in streams. Sediment and bacteria decreased in most of the monitored streams feeding the Bay. During the last three years of the project, bacterial counts near the public beach along the northern shore of the bay decreased to below state standards for swimming.
The RCWP project objective was 70% reduction in fecal coliform levels in the Bay. Farmers were highly motivated to participate, both out of concern for the shellfish resource and because of their awareness of the potential for state regulation if the problem could not be solved through voluntary NPS control measures. Manure storage and management BMPs were installed on 96% of the farms in the watershed. Innovative animal waste management practices developed for this high rainfall area (such as roofed and guttered manure storage areas) reduced bacterial contamination of the Bay. As a result, the number of shellfish beds closed to harvesting was reduced.
Sediment, bacteria, and nutrients impair recreation and fishing. The primary sources of sediment are intensive grazing in riparian areas, streambank erosion, and irrigation return flows. Animal feedlots and a sewage treatment plant contributed to high bacteria and nutrient levels.
A system of erosion control and stream protection BMPs was implemented on 71% of the critical area (60,242 acres), which was defined on the basis of high erosion rates and proximity to waterways. Irrigation water management was used to minimize total water usage, thereby reducing pollutants entering streams and ground water. Installation of irrigation tailwater re-use systems and construction of a secondary water storage reservoir, which reduced irrigation water use, were major components of the management program. An effective information and education program resulted in reduced fertilizer and pesticide use.
An innovative practice implemented by Long Pine Creek Project participants was stream protection using cedar revetments. Dried cedar trees were secured with cable and steel fence posts along the edge of the stream to stabilize the streambank and reduce erosion. In combination with grazing land protection and fencing, the revetments decreased streambank erosion.
Significant reductions in sediment delivery were achieved. Trout habitat was improved and the creek's trout-carrying capacity increased. Comparison of pre-, during-, and post-project water quality data is ongoing. The length of the monitoring record (15 years) and a high level of land treatment in the critical area provide the potential for documenting the effectiveness of BMP systems.
Judith A. Gale
Water Quality Extension Specialist
NCSU Water Quality Group
March 1995

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL & LIFE SCIENCES
Copies of the fact sheet series may be requested from: Publications Coordinator,
NCSU Water Quality Group, Department of Biological and Agricultural
Engineering, Box 7637, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7637, Email: wq_puborder@ncsu.edu, Fax: 919-515-7448.