

Prepared by:
Roy E. Carawan
Extension Food Science Specialist
North Carolina State University
Bill Merka
Extension Poultry Specialist
University of Georgia
Publication Number: CD-22
Last Electronic Revision: March 1996 (JWM)
Wastewater from many poultry processing plants is discharged to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). These treatment plants must remove most of the pollutants (waste load) before the water is discharged to a public waterway. Treating the wastewater costs money, and most treatment works charge according to the volume of water treated. In addition, they commonly charge extra (apply a surcharge) if the waste load exceeds certain preset levels because it costs more to treat water that contains more pollutants. In other words, they charge more to clean up "dirtier" water.
Waste load can be determined by a number of different measurements, including BOD5, the biochemical oxygen demand; COD, the chemical oxygen demand; TSS, the total suspended solids concentration; TKN, the total kjeldahl nitrogen content; and FOG, the concentration of fats, oils, and grease.
Poultry plant wastewater is most often tested for BOD5, a measure of the amount of oxygen needed to degrade the organic matter (feathers, fat, and blood) in the wastewater. The BOD5 concentration is measured in milligrams per liter (mg/l) When the level exceeds 250 to 300 mg/l, most treatment plants apply a surcharge.
Poultry plants may discharge as much as 65 pounds of BOD5 per thousand broilers processed. This waste load comes mainly from broiler components that find their way into the sewers. Blood alone can account for as much as 17.4 pounds of BOD5 per thousand birds processed, almost 30 percent of the plant's total waste load.
Sewer costs, once a minor operating expense, have become something that every cost-conscious manager must consider. At today's rates, a plant's waste load can have a real effect on profitability. Realizing this, some plant managers have been able to cut waste discharges to as little as 30 pounds of BOD5 per thousand broilers processed.
The table shows the daily and annual surcharge costs for the two plants. The operators of Plant A save $7.00 per thousand broilers. That means they can bank an extra $1,750 per day, or close to half a million dollars a year. In effect, Processor B is pouring that amount of money down the drain.
Plant A Plant B Savings
Waste load
(pounds of BOD5 per thousand broliers) .. 30 65 35
Daily surcharge* ........................ $666 $2,416 $1,750
Annual surcharge* ....................... $166,500 $604,000 $437,500
Cost per thousand broilers .............. $2.66 $9.66 $7.00
To estimate the potential savings for your plant, determine your current waste load per thousand birds processed and the sewer surcharges in your community. Then estimate the amount you think the waste load could be decreased by improved operating practices. Enter the values in the table and compute your savings.
Current Target
Waste Load Waste Load
Enter current and target waste load
per thousand birds processed ...................... ________ ________
Enter daily production in
thousands of birds .................. _____________
Multiply current and target waste loads by daily
production to find daily waste load ............... ________ ________
Enter your BOD5 surcharge cost
per pound ........................... $_____________
Multiply the daily waste load by the surcharge
cost to find your daily surcharge cost ............ $________ $________
Enter the number of days your
plant operates each year ............
Multiply the daily surcharge cost by the number
of days your plant operates annually to find
the annual surcharge cost ......................... $________ $________
Subtract the annual surcharge cost for the target
waste load from the annual cost for the current
waste load to find your annual savings ................... $__________
Some poultry plants have cut their BOD5 waste load to less than 16,000 pounds per day by using dissolved air flotation (DAF) cells. If your plant has a DAF cell, you may not feel a need to institute waste reduction practices. To gain a true understanding of total operating costs, however, it's necessary to take into account the cost of owning and operating a DAF cell and disposing of the sludge it produces.
Although a DAF cell may reduce waste concentrations below the surcharge level, the organics removed as sludge must be disposed of properly. Its high water content (often 97 percent) makes the DAF sludge expensive to haul and render. Some renderers will not even accept DAF sludge in offal for reduction into by-products meal because of processing cost and because the chemicals involved often limit the usefulness of the final product.
One processor estimates that operating a DAF cell costs 10 cents per gallon of sludge. Land application of the sludge may cost an additional 3 to 6 cents per gallon. Capital costs are not included in these estimates, nor are the costs of required testing, regulatory permits and forms, and monitoring.
Therefore, it pays to cut waste loads even if your plant has a DAF cell. Materials that never find their way into the plant's wastewater will not have to be removed and disposed of as sludge. The hints in the box should be helpful in minimizing waste.
Many changes are taking place in waste regulations. Water and waste costs are creeping steadily upward, and the increases promise to continue. It's important for poultry processors to take action now to be prepared for limitations on water use and waste loads that are likely to occur in the not-so-distant future.
Reduce your plant's waste load before it has a chance to become a costly burden and a point of contention with your local treatment plant.
Back up one
| Return to WQWM Home Page |
|---|