Soils and Water Quality


Prepared by:
Maurice G. Cook
Extension Soil Science Specialist


Published by: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service

Publication Number: AG 439-1

Last Electronic Revision: March 1996 (JWM)


How Soils Influence Water Quality

North Carolina has an abundant supply of clean water, a resource vital to our high quality of life. Rivers, lakes, groundwater aquifers, and coastal estuaries are crucial to public health, economic development, and recreational opportunities. However, our water sources are constantly threatened with degradation by such activities as imprudent development, improperly managed agricultural and industrial activities, and unsound waste disposal practices. The soil exerts an important influence on water quality. How we manage the soil determines, in part, the level of treatment required to make our water supplies safe and enjoyable. This fact sheet explains how soils influence water quality and why efficient soil management helps protect water quality.


Erosion and Sedimentation

When a soil is well managed, it is an efficient receiver of rainwater. If the soil is improperly managed, however, the water may run off the surface, carrying soil particles with it. This process, called soil erosion, has been a major cause of soil degradation in North Carolina for many years. Damage to water quality occurs when the eroded soil settles out in a body of water, a process called sedimentation. Sedimentation occurs when water carrying eroded soil particles slows long enough to allow soil particles to settle out. The smaller the particle, the longer it stays in suspension. Larger, heavier particles such as gravel and sand settle out sooner than smaller, lighter particles such as clay. Clay may stay in suspension for very long periods, contributing significantly to water turbidity. Sediment comes from many sources: agricultural fields, woodlands, highway road banks, construction sites, and mining operations. By volume, sediment is the largest water pollutant in North Carolina. It affects water quality physically, chemically, and biologically. Damage from sediment is expensive, both economically and environmentally. Sedimentation destroys fish spawning beds, reduces useful storage volume in reservoirs, clogs streams, and makes costly filtration necessary for municipal water supplies. Suspended sediment can reduce photosynthesis and alter a stream's ecology. Because the environmental damage from sediment is often additive, the ultimate effects and costs may not be evident for years. The consequences of off-site sedimentation can be severe, both for those immediately affected and for those who must cope with subsequent problems. Sediment often carries organic matter, animal or industrial wastes, adsorbed nutrients, and toxic chemicals. The most troublesome nutrient element is phosphorus: it stimulates the production of algae blooms that can choke out beneficial plants and smother aquatic animals. Excessive phosphorus may come from such sources as fertilizers, organic matter, and animal manure. Because phosphorus is concentrated in the top few inches of soil, it is very susceptible to erosion and likely to be present in sediment. Sediment may also carry pesticides—such as herbicides and insecticides —that may be toxic to aquatic plants and animals. The varying chemical properties of pesticides—for example, their solubility and chemical breakdown rate—help determine the damage they inflict on wate quality.

Runoff and Leaching

Runoff water can also transport potentially harmful dissolved chemicals from fields to bodies of water (Figures 1 and 2). Nitrogen can be particularly damaging, especially in the form of nitrate, NO3. Concentrations exceeding l0 milligrams (mg) of nitrogen per liter (44 mg of NO3) may induce animal and human health problems. Nitrogen also stimulates algae growth in the manner described earlier for phosphorus. Certain dissolved nutrients and pesticides can reach the ground-water by moving down through the soil. Nitrogen in nitrate form can move in this way. Preliminary results from an Agricultural Extension Service well-testing program indicate that the levels of nitrate nitrogen in groundwater are generally well below the critical level of 10 mg of nitrogen per liter, or 10 parts per million (ppm). Fewer than 3 percent of the wells sampled have nitrogen levels exceeding 10 ppm. Certain hazardous pesticide chemicals are highly mobile and have been detected in the groundwater of other states. Examples include aldicarb (Temik), alachlor (Lasso), and the triazines (Atrazine).

Household Waste Disposal

About half of the citizens of North Carolina depend on septic tanks (and hence on soil absorption) for the treatment and disposal of their household wastewaters. Over one million housing units in the state use on-site systems to dispose of their wastewater. At least 30,000 additional septic tank systems are installed each year. Each day, septic tanks discharge more than 100 million gallons of sewage into the soils of North Carolina. Septic tanks should be used only in soils that can filter, absorb, and treat waste constituents. Key soil properties to consider include depth, texture, structure, consistency, color, and the presence of restrictive layers. These properties should be evaluated to a depth of at least 6 feet to reveal any limitations. Each region of North Carolina poses potential problems for septic tank installation. In the piedmont, problems occur with thin, shallow soils over bedrock and with clayey soils whose mineral content causes them to swell extensively when wet. In the coastal plain, problems result from a seasonally high water table close to the soil surface. In the mountains, major soil problems occur on steep slopes, in shallow soils, and at the base of long slopes, where subsurface water can accumulate.

Land Application of Waste Materials

Municipalities and industries are increasingly interested in applying sludges from wastewater treatment plants to agricultural land. (See Extension Service publication AG-439-3, Health and Environmental Concerns for the Application of Municipal Sludge to Agricultural Lands.) Applications of livestock and poultry manure have also shown renewed popularity, both as a means of disposal and as a source of nutrients. Land application is an appropriate technique, but loading rates should be calculated carefully to avoid potential hazards. For land application, the characteristics of the wastes determine the amounts to use. Each waste will contain one constituent that limits the amount that can be safely applied to land. This limiting constituent may be one of the plant nutrients such as nitrogen or phosphorus or one of the heavy metals such as cadmium or lead. Waste regulations administered by the state and recommendations developed by North Carolina State University provide information on correct loading rates. With most wastes generated in North Carolina and applied to supply the nitrogen and phosphorus needs of a crop, health hazards and crop toxicities will not be a problem if recommendations are followed. The soil's capacity to dispose of, use, or treat waste varies significantly according to the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil and the characteristics of the wastes. Although general information on waste reactions in soil is available and although the environmental fate of many chemicals has been studied, the development of a land treatment system must be tailored to the characteristics of the specific site and the specific waste. The following are among the characteristics that would disqualify a site: steep slopes; very clayey or sandy soils; proximity to streams, wells, and property lines; a likelihood of flooding; and shallow depth to bedrock or the water table. Since each site has a finite capacity to accept certain waste constituents (for example, heavy metals such as zinc, copper, and cadmium), a threshold may be reached beyond which land application of wastes is no longer acceptable.

Importance of Good Soil Management

An understanding of soil properties and their management is essential for reducing the input of water pollutants from the soil. Reducing soil erosion is the key to reducing the damaging effects of sedimentation. Fortunately, with current technology, erosion can be reduced to acceptable levels. The challenge is to match the appropriate technology to each situation. The Soil Conservation Service has developed a variety of practices that improve surface water quality. Crops, crop residues, and structures are used (alone or in combination) to hold the soil in place and allow water to move into it rather than to run off the surface. Agricultural practices such as strip-cropping, contour cultivation, and filter strips are both beneficial and economical. Sometimes, more costly structures such as grassed waterways and terraces are required to provide the necessary control. Conservation tillage, which reduces soil disturbance and promotes residue cover on the land, is another effective way to reduce erosion. The benefits to water quality of several widely used conservation practices are shown in Table l. Certain practices that enhance surface water quality do little to improve the groundwater. In some cases, such practices may even prove harmful by increasing the amount of water that moves through the soil. It is essential, therefore, to determine whether the problem involves surface water or groundwater. Practices that minimize both forms of contamination must be developed. Soil properties determine the proper amounts of fertilizers and pesticides to apply and the timing and method of their application. For example, sandy soils cannot hold as large a quantity of nutrient elements and other adsorbed materials as can clay soils. Thus, the amount, frequency, and timing of chemical applications need to be adjusted for each situation. Furthermore, fertilizer levels should be based on realistic crop yield expectations, which vary with soil properties. Such monitoring helps avoid harmful levels of critical elements such as nitrogen and phosphorus. When applying organic wastes to the land, match the loading rate to the soil's absorbent capacity and the crop's ability to use the nutrients. Contamination from on-site waste disposal systems can be prevented by carefully selecting a soil site and installing the system appropriate to the soil's characteristics. Land application of wastes must play an integral part in the total soil management program. The composition and properties of the waste need to be known before it is applied. For example, manure must be thoroughly mixed into the soil to maximize the effectiveness of the nitrogen: manure exposed on the field's surface loses up to 25 percent of its ammonia nitrogen within two days; 60 percent or more can be lost within one month. Manure application rates should be based on the available portion of the nutrients and should not exceed the nutrient requirements of the crop. Excessive loading squanders valuable nutrients and may result in surface water and groundwater pollution. For characteristics of livestock and poultry manure, see Extension Service publications AG-439-4, Swine Manure as a Fertilizer Source, and AG-439-5, Poultry Manure as a Fertilizer Source, and also the North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. Soil testing should also be conducted to determine proper loading rates. An example of how to compute application rates is outlined in the worksheet on this page.


Table 1. Effects of Selected Conservation Practices on Water Quality

        
 
 Practice                Surface Water      Groundwater 
 
Chiseling and subsoil        + 	               N 
Conservation tillage 	     + 	               N 
Contour farming 	     + 	               N 
Cover crop 	             +	               + 
Crop residue use 	     + 	               N 
Field border 	             +	               N 
Filter strip	             + 	               N 
Grassed waterway	     +*	               N 
Strip-cropping (contour)     +	               N 
Subsurface drainage 	     N** 	       + 
Terrace 	             +	               N 
 
 Note: The plus sign (+) denotes a positive effect; the N denotes a neutral or
possibly unfavorable effect.
 
*Chemical maintenance of vegetation may lower the quality of runoff water. 
**The negative effect occurs where water table control is not applied.


Worksheet

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crop: corn

Expected yield: 100 bushels per acre

Organic waste: broiler litter (soil incorporated)

Nutrient recommendations (based on soil test):
	N	120 to 160 pounds per acre
	P2O5 	30 pounds per acre
	K2O  	30 pounds per acre
Nutrients per ton of waste (total per ton x availability coefficient):
	N	75 x 0.6 = 45 pounds
	P2O5 	82 x 0.8 = 66 pounds
	K2O	45 x 0.8 = 36 pounds
Waste required: 3 tons:*
	N	45 x 3 = 135 pounds per acre
	P2O5 	66 x 3 = 198 pounds per acre
	K2O	36 x 3 = 108 pounds per acre
*Note that 3 tons are needed so that the nitrogen level reaches 
the amount called for in the soil test recommendations.  One ton 
would have been sufficient for the other nutrients.


Conclusion

Various agricultural and industrial practices threaten our water with contaminants from the soil. These threats are serious, but they are also manageable. Water quality can be improved without sacrificing the quality of the soil for agricultural, industrial, and recreational uses. We can have both productive soil and clean water by applying good soil management practices.


The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement or criticism of the products named or discrimination against similar ones not mentioned.
Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.
AG 439-1